Message ID | 20170326185359.5182-2-u@pkh.me |
---|---|
State | Accepted |
Commit | 8f9edf89d5d4a90eed4a798175e97e07a885ab79 |
Headers | show |
Le sextidi 6 germinal, an CCXXV, Clement Boesch a écrit : > This conflict with the DJGPP libc which includes a pow2 function¹ > > We can not make DJGPP posix only to avoid the conflict due to the lack > of posix_memalign. "cannot", I think. Regards,
On Sun, Mar 26, 2017 at 08:56:49PM +0200, Nicolas George wrote: > Le sextidi 6 germinal, an CCXXV, Clement Boesch a écrit : > > This conflict with the DJGPP libc which includes a pow2 function¹ > > > > We can not make DJGPP posix only to avoid the conflict due to the lack > > of posix_memalign. > > "cannot", I think. > Updated description with the following: We cannot make DJGPP POSIX only (using -D_POSIX_SOURCE) to avoid this kind of symbols conflicts due to the lack of both posix_memalign and memalign (DJGPP non standard function) in that POSIX mode. We currently rely on memalign for aligned heap allocation.
On 3/27/17, Clement Boesch <u@pkh.me> wrote: > On Sun, Mar 26, 2017 at 08:56:49PM +0200, Nicolas George wrote: >> Le sextidi 6 germinal, an CCXXV, Clement Boesch a ecrit : >> > This conflict with the DJGPP libc which includes a pow2 function^1 >> > >> > We can not make DJGPP posix only to avoid the conflict due to the lack >> > of posix_memalign. >> >> "cannot", I think. >> > > Updated description with the following: > > We cannot make DJGPP POSIX only (using -D_POSIX_SOURCE) to avoid this > kind of symbols conflicts due to the lack of both posix_memalign and > memalign (DJGPP non standard function) in that POSIX mode. We currently > rely on memalign for aligned heap allocation. > ok
diff --git a/libavfilter/af_dynaudnorm.c b/libavfilter/af_dynaudnorm.c index ddbef26ab5..aa5b28e647 100644 --- a/libavfilter/af_dynaudnorm.c +++ b/libavfilter/af_dynaudnorm.c @@ -341,7 +341,7 @@ static inline double fade(double prev, double next, int pos, return fade_factors[0][pos] * prev + fade_factors[1][pos] * next; } -static inline double pow2(const double value) +static inline double pow_2(const double value) { return value * value; } @@ -384,7 +384,7 @@ static double compute_frame_rms(AVFrame *frame, int channel) const double *data_ptr = (double *)frame->extended_data[c]; for (i = 0; i < frame->nb_samples; i++) { - rms_value += pow2(data_ptr[i]); + rms_value += pow_2(data_ptr[i]); } } @@ -392,7 +392,7 @@ static double compute_frame_rms(AVFrame *frame, int channel) } else { const double *data_ptr = (double *)frame->extended_data[channel]; for (i = 0; i < frame->nb_samples; i++) { - rms_value += pow2(data_ptr[i]); + rms_value += pow_2(data_ptr[i]); } rms_value /= frame->nb_samples; @@ -545,7 +545,7 @@ static double compute_frame_std_dev(DynamicAudioNormalizerContext *s, const double *data_ptr = (double *)frame->extended_data[c]; for (i = 0; i < frame->nb_samples; i++) { - variance += pow2(data_ptr[i]); // Assume that MEAN is *zero* + variance += pow_2(data_ptr[i]); // Assume that MEAN is *zero* } } variance /= (s->channels * frame->nb_samples) - 1; @@ -553,7 +553,7 @@ static double compute_frame_std_dev(DynamicAudioNormalizerContext *s, const double *data_ptr = (double *)frame->extended_data[channel]; for (i = 0; i < frame->nb_samples; i++) { - variance += pow2(data_ptr[i]); // Assume that MEAN is *zero* + variance += pow_2(data_ptr[i]); // Assume that MEAN is *zero* } variance /= frame->nb_samples - 1; }