Message ID | 20171122120434.14250-1-michael@niedermayer.cc |
---|---|
State | Accepted |
Commit | 883de7e8b4fee252464b15e0351c6e5733e36e54 |
Headers | show |
On 11/22/2017 12:04 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > Signed-off-by: Michael Niedermayer <michael@niedermayer.cc> > --- > libavformat/mov.c | 3 +-- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) If it's a duplicate check, is there even a gain from using an assert? - Derek
On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 02:09:46PM +0000, Derek Buitenhuis wrote: > On 11/22/2017 12:04 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Michael Niedermayer <michael@niedermayer.cc> > > --- > > libavformat/mov.c | 3 +-- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) > > If it's a duplicate check, is there even a gain from using an assert? not much, no its a non static function tough i can remove the check completely if thats preferred ?
On 11/22/2017 8:09 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > not much, no > its a non static function tough > i can remove the check completely if thats preferred ? I guess leave it since it's non-static. LGTM. - Derek
On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 08:19:45PM +0000, Derek Buitenhuis wrote: > On 11/22/2017 8:09 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > > not much, no > > its a non static function tough > > i can remove the check completely if thats preferred ? > > I guess leave it since it's non-static. > > LGTM. ok, will apply thx [...]
diff --git a/libavformat/mov.c b/libavformat/mov.c index 9e876efc8c..6940dfc7d5 100644 --- a/libavformat/mov.c +++ b/libavformat/mov.c @@ -2437,8 +2437,7 @@ int ff_mov_read_stsd_entries(MOVContext *c, AVIOContext *pb, int entries) MOVStreamContext *sc; int pseudo_stream_id; - if (c->fc->nb_streams < 1) - return 0; + av_assert0 (c->fc->nb_streams >= 1); st = c->fc->streams[c->fc->nb_streams-1]; sc = st->priv_data;
Signed-off-by: Michael Niedermayer <michael@niedermayer.cc> --- libavformat/mov.c | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)