Message ID | 20180418213538.GD20131@michaelspb |
---|---|
State | Not Applicable |
Headers | show |
On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 12:35 AM, Michael Niedermayer <michael@niedermayer.cc> wrote: > > This breaks fate: (have not tested anything beyond this) > > TEST adtstoasc_ticket3715 > --- ./tests/ref/fate/adtstoasc_ticket3715 2018-04-17 14:20:30.500366780 +0200 > +++ tests/data/fate/adtstoasc_ticket3715 2018-04-18 23:34:00.751854625 +0200 > @@ -92,4 +92,4 @@ > 0, 83968, 83968, 1024, 465, 0xeb3ce0af > 0, 84992, 84992, 1024, 326, 0x7be4a667 > 0, 86016, 86016, 1024, 339, 0x2cf4a71f > -0, 87040, 87040, 1028, 258, 0xd4007ad4 > +0, 87040, 87040, 1024, 258, 0xd4007ad4 > Test adtstoasc_ticket3715 failed. Look at tests/data/fate/adtstoasc_ticket3715.err for details. > make: *** [fate-adtstoasc_ticket3715] Error 1 > Just an off-hand comment that given that audio frames in AAC tend to have 1024 samples usually (or in more general, "1028 samples is quite unlikely for AAC"), I'd say 1024 is correct for a duration of an AAC frame. Looking at the hash, the actual data doesn't seem to have gotten changed. Best regards, Jan
On 4/18/2018 11:08 PM, Jan Ekström wrote: > Just an off-hand comment that given that audio frames in AAC tend to > have 1024 samples usually (or in more general, "1028 samples is quite > unlikely for AAC"), I'd say 1024 is correct for a duration of an AAC > frame. Looking at the hash, the actual data doesn't seem to have > gotten changed. Yes, I agree. I will resend with changes to FATE accounted for. Going to wait until someone reviews the concept first. CCed The author of the changed code in question (Sasi). - Derek
--- ./tests/ref/fate/adtstoasc_ticket3715 2018-04-17 14:20:30.500366780 +0200 +++ tests/data/fate/adtstoasc_ticket3715 2018-04-18 23:34:00.751854625 +0200 @@ -92,4 +92,4 @@ 0, 83968, 83968, 1024, 465, 0xeb3ce0af 0, 84992, 84992, 1024, 326, 0x7be4a667 0, 86016, 86016, 1024, 339, 0x2cf4a71f -0, 87040, 87040, 1028, 258, 0xd4007ad4 +0, 87040, 87040, 1024, 258, 0xd4007ad4