| Message ID | 20210605182259.1888-1-val.zapod.vz@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| State | Superseded |
| Headers | show |
| Series | [FFmpeg-devel] avformat/mxfdec: fixed jp2k_rsiz and 240M matrix | expand |
| Context | Check | Description |
|---|---|---|
| andriy/x86_make | success | Make finished |
| andriy/x86_make_fate | success | Make fate finished |
| andriy/PPC64_make | success | Make finished |
| andriy/PPC64_make_fate | success | Make fate finished |
On Sat, 5 Jun 2021, Valerii Zapodovnikov wrote: > Again. 240M matrix is different from BT.601! And 170M is the same > as BT.601. It is primaries that are the same in 240M and 170M, as > for jp2k_rsiz see page 10 of S422M-2006. Yes, IT IS THERE. > --- > libavformat/mxf.c | 2 +- > libavformat/mxfdec.c | 2 +- > 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/libavformat/mxf.c b/libavformat/mxf.c > index 85a65f8718..7c355d789b 100644 > --- a/libavformat/mxf.c > +++ b/libavformat/mxf.c > @@ -132,7 +132,7 @@ const MXFCodecUL ff_mxf_color_space_uls[] = { > { { 0x06,0x0E,0x2B,0x34,0x04,0x01,0x01,0x0D,0x04,0x01,0x01,0x01,0x02,0x05,0x00,0x00 }, 14, AVCOL_SPC_RGB }, /* GBR */ > { { 0x06,0x0E,0x2B,0x34,0x04,0x01,0x01,0x0D,0x04,0x01,0x01,0x01,0x02,0x06,0x00,0x00 }, 14, AVCOL_SPC_BT2020_NCL }, /* ITU-R BT.2020 Non-Constant Luminance */ > /* alternate mappings for encoding */ > - { { 0x06,0x0E,0x2B,0x34,0x04,0x01,0x01,0x06,0x04,0x01,0x01,0x01,0x02,0x03,0x00,0x00 }, 14, AVCOL_SPC_SMPTE170M }, /* = AVCOL_SPC_SMPTE240M */ > + { { 0x06,0x0E,0x2B,0x34,0x04,0x01,0x01,0x01,0x04,0x01,0x01,0x01,0x02,0x01,0x00,0x00 }, 14, AVCOL_SPC_SMPTE170M }, /* = AVCOL_SPC_BT470BG */ > > { { 0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00 }, 0, AVCOL_SPC_UNSPECIFIED }, > }; > diff --git a/libavformat/mxfdec.c b/libavformat/mxfdec.c > index 3bf480a3a6..9e92ef4175 100644 > --- a/libavformat/mxfdec.c > +++ b/libavformat/mxfdec.c > @@ -330,7 +330,7 @@ static const uint8_t mxf_encrypted_triplet_key[] = { 0x06,0x0e,0x2b,0x > static const uint8_t mxf_encrypted_essence_container[] = { 0x06,0x0e,0x2b,0x34,0x04,0x01,0x01,0x07,0x0d,0x01,0x03,0x01,0x02,0x0b,0x01,0x00 }; > static const uint8_t mxf_sony_mpeg4_extradata[] = { 0x06,0x0e,0x2b,0x34,0x04,0x01,0x01,0x01,0x0e,0x06,0x06,0x02,0x02,0x01,0x00,0x00 }; > static const uint8_t mxf_avid_project_name[] = { 0xa5,0xfb,0x7b,0x25,0xf6,0x15,0x94,0xb9,0x62,0xfc,0x37,0x17,0x49,0x2d,0x42,0xbf }; > -static const uint8_t mxf_jp2k_rsiz[] = { 0x06,0x0e,0x2b,0x34,0x02,0x05,0x01,0x01,0x0d,0x01,0x02,0x01,0x01,0x02,0x01,0x00 }; > +static const uint8_t mxf_jp2k_rsiz[] = { 0x06,0x0e,0x2b,0x34,0x01,0x01,0x01,0x0a,0x04,0x01,0x06,0x03,0x01,0x00,0x00,0x00 }; Where does the original UL come from? Because based on the original patch which added this key, I don't think it is a typo, it looks like this key was added for a specific reason. So the better approach seems to be to rename the old key to something like mxf_jp2k_rsiz_alternate, and check both the official key and the old key. Also splitting the two changes to two patches would be nicer... Thanks, Marton > static const uint8_t mxf_indirect_value_utf16le[] = { 0x4c,0x00,0x02,0x10,0x01,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x06,0x0e,0x2b,0x34,0x01,0x04,0x01,0x01 }; > static const uint8_t mxf_indirect_value_utf16be[] = { 0x42,0x01,0x10,0x02,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x06,0x0e,0x2b,0x34,0x01,0x04,0x01,0x01 }; > static const uint8_t mxf_apple_coll_max_cll[] = { 0x06,0x0e,0x2b,0x34,0x01,0x01,0x01,0x0e,0x0e,0x20,0x04,0x01,0x05,0x03,0x01,0x01 }; > -- > 2.30.2 > > _______________________________________________ > ffmpeg-devel mailing list > ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org > https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel > > To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email > ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe". >
On Sat, 5 Jun 2021, Marton Balint wrote: > > > On Sat, 5 Jun 2021, Valerii Zapodovnikov wrote: > >> -static const uint8_t mxf_jp2k_rsiz[] = { >> 0x06,0x0e,0x2b,0x34,0x02,0x05,0x01,0x01,0x0d,0x01,0x02,0x01,0x01,0x02,0x01,0x00 >> }; >> +static const uint8_t mxf_jp2k_rsiz[] = { >> 0x06,0x0e,0x2b,0x34,0x01,0x01,0x01,0x0a,0x04,0x01,0x06,0x03,0x01,0x00,0x00,0x00 >> }; > > Where does the original UL come from? Because based on the original patch > which added this key, I don't think it is a typo, it looks like this key was > added for a specific reason. So the better approach seems to be to rename the > old key to something like mxf_jp2k_rsiz_alternate, and check both the > official key and the old key. On second look, it may well be a copy/paste typo indeed, because the specified key is for partition type OpenIncompleteHeaderPartition... Patch looks good then. Thanks, Marton
Of course it is a PeRfEct copy paste, I should have mentioned that (and I asked Rémi to send the patch about RSIZ for XYZ, BTW). Also what this patch actually fixes is encoding 170M, not 240M. Will fix that too. Also should note that SMPTE ST 422:2019 is now free of charge. Yeah!
diff --git a/libavformat/mxf.c b/libavformat/mxf.c index 85a65f8718..7c355d789b 100644 --- a/libavformat/mxf.c +++ b/libavformat/mxf.c @@ -132,7 +132,7 @@ const MXFCodecUL ff_mxf_color_space_uls[] = { { { 0x06,0x0E,0x2B,0x34,0x04,0x01,0x01,0x0D,0x04,0x01,0x01,0x01,0x02,0x05,0x00,0x00 }, 14, AVCOL_SPC_RGB }, /* GBR */ { { 0x06,0x0E,0x2B,0x34,0x04,0x01,0x01,0x0D,0x04,0x01,0x01,0x01,0x02,0x06,0x00,0x00 }, 14, AVCOL_SPC_BT2020_NCL }, /* ITU-R BT.2020 Non-Constant Luminance */ /* alternate mappings for encoding */ - { { 0x06,0x0E,0x2B,0x34,0x04,0x01,0x01,0x06,0x04,0x01,0x01,0x01,0x02,0x03,0x00,0x00 }, 14, AVCOL_SPC_SMPTE170M }, /* = AVCOL_SPC_SMPTE240M */ + { { 0x06,0x0E,0x2B,0x34,0x04,0x01,0x01,0x01,0x04,0x01,0x01,0x01,0x02,0x01,0x00,0x00 }, 14, AVCOL_SPC_SMPTE170M }, /* = AVCOL_SPC_BT470BG */ { { 0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00 }, 0, AVCOL_SPC_UNSPECIFIED }, }; diff --git a/libavformat/mxfdec.c b/libavformat/mxfdec.c index 3bf480a3a6..9e92ef4175 100644 --- a/libavformat/mxfdec.c +++ b/libavformat/mxfdec.c @@ -330,7 +330,7 @@ static const uint8_t mxf_encrypted_triplet_key[] = { 0x06,0x0e,0x2b,0x static const uint8_t mxf_encrypted_essence_container[] = { 0x06,0x0e,0x2b,0x34,0x04,0x01,0x01,0x07,0x0d,0x01,0x03,0x01,0x02,0x0b,0x01,0x00 }; static const uint8_t mxf_sony_mpeg4_extradata[] = { 0x06,0x0e,0x2b,0x34,0x04,0x01,0x01,0x01,0x0e,0x06,0x06,0x02,0x02,0x01,0x00,0x00 }; static const uint8_t mxf_avid_project_name[] = { 0xa5,0xfb,0x7b,0x25,0xf6,0x15,0x94,0xb9,0x62,0xfc,0x37,0x17,0x49,0x2d,0x42,0xbf }; -static const uint8_t mxf_jp2k_rsiz[] = { 0x06,0x0e,0x2b,0x34,0x02,0x05,0x01,0x01,0x0d,0x01,0x02,0x01,0x01,0x02,0x01,0x00 }; +static const uint8_t mxf_jp2k_rsiz[] = { 0x06,0x0e,0x2b,0x34,0x01,0x01,0x01,0x0a,0x04,0x01,0x06,0x03,0x01,0x00,0x00,0x00 }; static const uint8_t mxf_indirect_value_utf16le[] = { 0x4c,0x00,0x02,0x10,0x01,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x06,0x0e,0x2b,0x34,0x01,0x04,0x01,0x01 }; static const uint8_t mxf_indirect_value_utf16be[] = { 0x42,0x01,0x10,0x02,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x06,0x0e,0x2b,0x34,0x01,0x04,0x01,0x01 }; static const uint8_t mxf_apple_coll_max_cll[] = { 0x06,0x0e,0x2b,0x34,0x01,0x01,0x01,0x0e,0x0e,0x20,0x04,0x01,0x05,0x03,0x01,0x01 };