Message ID | 20210607230414.612-1-dcnieho@gmail.com |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | avdevice (mostly dshow) enhancements | expand |
Actually I do not know how well will this work. Did you ever play any stream? Even if you play it without forcing seeking you are allowed to search forth due to how latency works. That problem with latency was only fixed in CMAF. ONE must to accelerate decoding forward in time to get low latency. Now hardware devices are different. But still, what about pause? What about seeking in the end which was BTW broken: see in https://patchwork.ffmpeg.org/project/ffmpeg/patch/20210604062818.2099-1-val.zapod.vz@gmail.com/ I mean, I agree this should be the default.
On Tue, Jun 8, 2021 at 2:13 AM Valerii Zapodovnikov <val.zapod.vz@gmail.com> wrote: > Actually I do not know how well will this work. Did you ever play any > stream? Even if you play it without forcing seeking you are allowed to > search forth due to how latency works. That problem with latency was only > fixed in CMAF. ONE must to accelerate decoding forward in time to get low > latency. > > Now hardware devices are different. But still, what about pause? What about > seeking in the end which was BTW broken: see in > > https://patchwork.ffmpeg.org/project/ffmpeg/patch/20210604062818.2099-1-val.zapod.vz@gmail.com/ > > I mean, I agree this should be the default. > In its current state, dshow (and from a quick look) many other devices do not support any seeking in either direction. So i think they should be properly flagged as such, at least to get a meaningful error when attempting to seek. By the way, despite using git send-email to send the whole series at once, it seems that they didn't end up in a nice thread (even though headers with in-reply-to were correct), nor did patchworks pick up all the patches (it missed 2/35 [and 5/35], so only attempted to build the first....). What could be the issue here, should i throttle send-email somehow for instance?
Just resend them (without any -v2).
didn't have the patchst anymore and already processed comments in later patches, so 02/35 and 05/35 became out of 33. Noticed that too late. Hope that doesn't confuse anything. Else we'll get it on -v2 of this series (which there will certainly be), where i think i'll throttle sending a bit (somehow). On Tue, Jun 8, 2021 at 11:34 AM Valerii Zapodovnikov <val.zapod.vz@gmail.com> wrote: > Just resend them (without any -v2). > _______________________________________________ > ffmpeg-devel mailing list > ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org > https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel > > To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email > ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe". >