| Message ID | 00191d35-1b3b-477c-ac70-e2d0e979ba16@betaapp.fastmail.com |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
| Series | [FFmpeg-devel] doc: mention that for RISC-V, we prefer .S files | expand |
| Context | Check | Description |
|---|---|---|
| yinshiyou/make_loongarch64 | success | Make finished |
| yinshiyou/make_fate_loongarch64 | success | Make fate finished |
| andriy/make_x86 | success | Make finished |
| andriy/make_fate_x86 | success | Make fate finished |
"Jean-Baptiste Kempf" <jb@videolan.org> writes: > $subject > > See attachment. Pushed with slight commit rewording for clarity.
Le 5 décembre 2023 11:59:39 GMT+02:00, Jean-Baptiste Kempf <jb@videolan.org> a écrit : >$subject > >See attachment. I think that the non-ISA specification is a better reference than GNU/binutils. The later takes some controversial liberties from the earlier. And while I blame LLVM as a project for sitting on the `.option arch` support patch set for months and months, I don't blame them for adhering to the specification where binutils doesn't.
From 13eb5105ff6fe664d4a45da6970875ceb763dfe0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jean-Baptiste Kempf <jb@videolan.org> Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2023 10:56:55 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] doc: mention that for RISC-V, we prefer .S files --- doc/developer.texi | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/doc/developer.texi b/doc/developer.texi index 26dc5b9749..eed0ee4915 100644 --- a/doc/developer.texi +++ b/doc/developer.texi @@ -99,7 +99,7 @@ The specific syntax used for writing assembly is: NASM on x86; @item -GAS on ARM. +GAS on ARM and RISC-V. @end itemize A unit testing framework for assembly called @code{checkasm} lives under -- 2.43.0