Message ID | 20170901180016.704-1-jamrial@gmail.com |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
On Fri, Sep 01, 2017 at 03:00:16PM -0300, James Almer wrote: > This flag replaces the deprecated, non-prefixed HWACCEL_CODEC_CAP_EXPERIMENTAL > one. > > Signed-off-by: James Almer <jamrial@gmail.com> > --- > No HWAccel uses HWACCEL_CODEC_CAP_EXPERIMENTAL at all. I wonder if we > shouldn't instead just not bother replacing it and consider adding it > once and if an hwaccel is ever committed in an unfinished way. > > doc/APIchanges | 4 ++++ > libavcodec/avcodec.h | 8 +++++++- > libavcodec/decode.c | 2 +- > libavcodec/version.h | 4 ++-- > 4 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) LGTM thx [...]
On 9/2/2017 6:47 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > On Fri, Sep 01, 2017 at 03:00:16PM -0300, James Almer wrote: >> This flag replaces the deprecated, non-prefixed HWACCEL_CODEC_CAP_EXPERIMENTAL >> one. >> >> Signed-off-by: James Almer <jamrial@gmail.com> >> --- >> No HWAccel uses HWACCEL_CODEC_CAP_EXPERIMENTAL at all. I wonder if we >> shouldn't instead just not bother replacing it and consider adding it >> once and if an hwaccel is ever committed in an unfinished way. >> >> doc/APIchanges | 4 ++++ >> libavcodec/avcodec.h | 8 +++++++- >> libavcodec/decode.c | 2 +- >> libavcodec/version.h | 4 ++-- >> 4 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > LGTM > > thx If nobody speaks and argues in favor of just dropping the flag altogether with the bump then i'll push it. Thanks.
On 9/2/2017 6:51 PM, James Almer wrote: > On 9/2/2017 6:47 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote: >> On Fri, Sep 01, 2017 at 03:00:16PM -0300, James Almer wrote: >>> This flag replaces the deprecated, non-prefixed HWACCEL_CODEC_CAP_EXPERIMENTAL >>> one. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: James Almer <jamrial@gmail.com> >>> --- >>> No HWAccel uses HWACCEL_CODEC_CAP_EXPERIMENTAL at all. I wonder if we >>> shouldn't instead just not bother replacing it and consider adding it >>> once and if an hwaccel is ever committed in an unfinished way. >>> >>> doc/APIchanges | 4 ++++ >>> libavcodec/avcodec.h | 8 +++++++- >>> libavcodec/decode.c | 2 +- >>> libavcodec/version.h | 4 ++-- >>> 4 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) >> >> LGTM >> >> thx > > If nobody speaks and argues in favor of just dropping the flag > altogether with the bump then i'll push it. > > Thanks. Pushed.
diff --git a/doc/APIchanges b/doc/APIchanges index 4effbf9364..0d459ba8c0 100644 --- a/doc/APIchanges +++ b/doc/APIchanges @@ -15,6 +15,10 @@ libavutil: 2015-08-28 API changes, most recent first: +2017-09-xx - xxxxxxx - lavc 57.105.100 - avcodec.h + Add AV_HWACCEL_CODEC_CAP_EXPERIMENTAL, replacing the deprecated + HWACCEL_CODEC_CAP_EXPERIMENTAL flag. + 2017-09-01 - xxxxxxx - lavf 57.81.100 - avio.h Add avio_read_partial(). diff --git a/libavcodec/avcodec.h b/libavcodec/avcodec.h index 513236a863..7708bb2adb 100644 --- a/libavcodec/avcodec.h +++ b/libavcodec/avcodec.h @@ -3879,7 +3879,7 @@ typedef struct AVHWAccel { /** * Hardware accelerated codec capabilities. - * see HWACCEL_CODEC_CAP_* + * see AV_HWACCEL_CODEC_CAP_* */ int capabilities; @@ -3988,6 +3988,12 @@ typedef struct AVHWAccel { } AVHWAccel; /** + * HWAccel is experimental and is thus avoided in favor of non experimental + * codecs + */ +#define AV_HWACCEL_CODEC_CAP_EXPERIMENTAL 0x0200 + +/** * Hardware acceleration should be used for decoding even if the codec level * used is unknown or higher than the maximum supported level reported by the * hardware driver. diff --git a/libavcodec/decode.c b/libavcodec/decode.c index 9b57910842..892143c1d2 100644 --- a/libavcodec/decode.c +++ b/libavcodec/decode.c @@ -1150,7 +1150,7 @@ static int setup_hwaccel(AVCodecContext *avctx, return AVERROR(ENOENT); } - if (hwa->capabilities & HWACCEL_CODEC_CAP_EXPERIMENTAL && + if (hwa->capabilities & AV_HWACCEL_CODEC_CAP_EXPERIMENTAL && avctx->strict_std_compliance > FF_COMPLIANCE_EXPERIMENTAL) { av_log(avctx, AV_LOG_WARNING, "Ignoring experimental hwaccel: %s\n", hwa->name); diff --git a/libavcodec/version.h b/libavcodec/version.h index 29cdb85589..55b8ddc13c 100644 --- a/libavcodec/version.h +++ b/libavcodec/version.h @@ -28,8 +28,8 @@ #include "libavutil/version.h" #define LIBAVCODEC_VERSION_MAJOR 57 -#define LIBAVCODEC_VERSION_MINOR 104 -#define LIBAVCODEC_VERSION_MICRO 101 +#define LIBAVCODEC_VERSION_MINOR 105 +#define LIBAVCODEC_VERSION_MICRO 100 #define LIBAVCODEC_VERSION_INT AV_VERSION_INT(LIBAVCODEC_VERSION_MAJOR, \ LIBAVCODEC_VERSION_MINOR, \
This flag replaces the deprecated, non-prefixed HWACCEL_CODEC_CAP_EXPERIMENTAL one. Signed-off-by: James Almer <jamrial@gmail.com> --- No HWAccel uses HWACCEL_CODEC_CAP_EXPERIMENTAL at all. I wonder if we shouldn't instead just not bother replacing it and consider adding it once and if an hwaccel is ever committed in an unfinished way. doc/APIchanges | 4 ++++ libavcodec/avcodec.h | 8 +++++++- libavcodec/decode.c | 2 +- libavcodec/version.h | 4 ++-- 4 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)