Message ID | 20190906152829.639-1-lance.lmwang@gmail.com |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
On Fri, Sep 06, 2019 at 11:28:28PM +0800, lance.lmwang@gmail.com wrote: > From: Limin Wang <lance.lmwang@gmail.com> > > Signed-off-by: Limin Wang <lance.lmwang@gmail.com> > --- > libavcodec/v210dec.c | 3 +-- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/libavcodec/v210dec.c b/libavcodec/v210dec.c > index 5a33d8c..6ce18aa 100644 > --- a/libavcodec/v210dec.c > +++ b/libavcodec/v210dec.c > @@ -98,8 +98,7 @@ static int decode_frame(AVCodecContext *avctx, void *data, int *got_frame, > return AVERROR_INVALIDDATA; > } > } > - if ( avctx->codec_tag == MKTAG('C', '2', '1', '0') > - && avpkt->size > 64 > + if (avctx->codec_tag == MKTAG('C', '2', '1', '0') > && AV_RN32(psrc) == AV_RN32("INFO") > && avpkt->size - 64 >= stride * avctx->height) > psrc += 64; Iam undecided on this, the change is correct but iam not sure it makes the code easier to understand also it makes the code less robust. For example the check is just unneeded as long as the types of the variables arent changed thx [...]
On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 09:07:38PM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > On Fri, Sep 06, 2019 at 11:28:28PM +0800, lance.lmwang@gmail.com wrote: > > From: Limin Wang <lance.lmwang@gmail.com> > > > > Signed-off-by: Limin Wang <lance.lmwang@gmail.com> > > --- > > libavcodec/v210dec.c | 3 +-- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/libavcodec/v210dec.c b/libavcodec/v210dec.c > > index 5a33d8c..6ce18aa 100644 > > --- a/libavcodec/v210dec.c > > +++ b/libavcodec/v210dec.c > > @@ -98,8 +98,7 @@ static int decode_frame(AVCodecContext *avctx, void *data, int *got_frame, > > return AVERROR_INVALIDDATA; > > } > > } > > - if ( avctx->codec_tag == MKTAG('C', '2', '1', '0') > > - && avpkt->size > 64 > > + if (avctx->codec_tag == MKTAG('C', '2', '1', '0') > > && AV_RN32(psrc) == AV_RN32("INFO") > > && avpkt->size - 64 >= stride * avctx->height) > > psrc += 64; > > Iam undecided on this, the change is correct but iam not sure > it makes the code easier to understand also it makes the code > less robust. For example the check is just unneeded as long > as the types of the variables arent changed thanks for the feedback, please ignore the patch anyway. I'll update patch#2 only. > > thx > > [...] > -- > Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB > > I know you won't believe me, but the highest form of Human Excellence is > to question oneself and others. -- Socrates > _______________________________________________ > ffmpeg-devel mailing list > ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org > https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel > > To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email > ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
diff --git a/libavcodec/v210dec.c b/libavcodec/v210dec.c index 5a33d8c..6ce18aa 100644 --- a/libavcodec/v210dec.c +++ b/libavcodec/v210dec.c @@ -98,8 +98,7 @@ static int decode_frame(AVCodecContext *avctx, void *data, int *got_frame, return AVERROR_INVALIDDATA; } } - if ( avctx->codec_tag == MKTAG('C', '2', '1', '0') - && avpkt->size > 64 + if (avctx->codec_tag == MKTAG('C', '2', '1', '0') && AV_RN32(psrc) == AV_RN32("INFO") && avpkt->size - 64 >= stride * avctx->height) psrc += 64;