Message ID | 20221229212024.422950-1-nowrep@gmail.com |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Series | [FFmpeg-devel] vaapi_encode_h264: Only set pic_order_cnt_type to 0 with B-frames | expand |
Context | Check | Description |
---|---|---|
yinshiyou/make_loongarch64 | success | Make finished |
yinshiyou/make_fate_loongarch64 | success | Make fate finished |
andriy/make_x86 | success | Make finished |
andriy/make_fate_x86 | success | Make fate finished |
On Do, 2022-12-29 at 22:20 +0100, David Rosca wrote: > --- > libavcodec/vaapi_encode_h264.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/libavcodec/vaapi_encode_h264.c b/libavcodec/vaapi_encode_h264.c > index dd17be2..d6926c4 100644 > --- a/libavcodec/vaapi_encode_h264.c > +++ b/libavcodec/vaapi_encode_h264.c > @@ -350,7 +350,7 @@ static int > vaapi_encode_h264_init_sequence_params(AVCodecContext *avctx) > sps->chroma_format_idc = 1; > > sps->log2_max_frame_num_minus4 = 4; > - sps->pic_order_cnt_type = 0; > + sps->pic_order_cnt_type = ctx->max_b_depth ? 0 : 2; pic_order_cnt_type (0) should work for ctx->max_b_depth == 0. If 2 is preferred for your vaapi driver, it would be better to query the capability from the driver, like as what commit 9f02e033875185409c861846f209b04a3be339d2 did. Thanks Haihao > sps->log2_max_pic_order_cnt_lsb_minus4 = 4; > > sps->max_num_ref_frames = priv->dpb_frames;
On Mon, Jan 9, 2023 at 3:22 AM Xiang, Haihao <haihao.xiang@intel.com> wrote: > > On Do, 2022-12-29 at 22:20 +0100, David Rosca wrote: > > --- > > libavcodec/vaapi_encode_h264.c | 2 +- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/libavcodec/vaapi_encode_h264.c b/libavcodec/vaapi_encode_h264.c > > index dd17be2..d6926c4 100644 > > --- a/libavcodec/vaapi_encode_h264.c > > +++ b/libavcodec/vaapi_encode_h264.c > > @@ -350,7 +350,7 @@ static int > > vaapi_encode_h264_init_sequence_params(AVCodecContext *avctx) > > sps->chroma_format_idc = 1; > > > > sps->log2_max_frame_num_minus4 = 4; > > - sps->pic_order_cnt_type = 0; > > + sps->pic_order_cnt_type = ctx->max_b_depth ? 0 : 2; > > > pic_order_cnt_type (0) should work for ctx->max_b_depth == 0. If 2 is preferred > for your vaapi driver, it would be better to query the capability from the > driver, like as what commit 9f02e033875185409c861846f209b04a3be339d2 did. It's not about an encoder, but rather about decoder. Some decoders (namely the Snapdragon HW decoder) will buffer frames when pic_order_cnt_type == 0 (in case the frames will be reordered?) which results in undesired increased latency. Setting pic_order_cnt_type to 2 will fix this problem, and it is also what libx264 does [0]. Regards, David [0] https://code.videolan.org/videolan/x264/-/blob/master/encoder/set.c#L173 > > Thanks > Haihao > > > sps->log2_max_pic_order_cnt_lsb_minus4 = 4; > > > > sps->max_num_ref_frames = priv->dpb_frames;
On 09/01/2023 07:37, David Rosca wrote: > On Mon, Jan 9, 2023 at 3:22 AM Xiang, Haihao <haihao.xiang@intel.com> wrote: >> >> On Do, 2022-12-29 at 22:20 +0100, David Rosca wrote: >>> --- >>> libavcodec/vaapi_encode_h264.c | 2 +- >>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/libavcodec/vaapi_encode_h264.c b/libavcodec/vaapi_encode_h264.c >>> index dd17be2..d6926c4 100644 >>> --- a/libavcodec/vaapi_encode_h264.c >>> +++ b/libavcodec/vaapi_encode_h264.c >>> @@ -350,7 +350,7 @@ static int >>> vaapi_encode_h264_init_sequence_params(AVCodecContext *avctx) >>> sps->chroma_format_idc = 1; >>> >>> sps->log2_max_frame_num_minus4 = 4; >>> - sps->pic_order_cnt_type = 0; >>> + sps->pic_order_cnt_type = ctx->max_b_depth ? 0 : 2; >> >> >> pic_order_cnt_type (0) should work for ctx->max_b_depth == 0. If 2 is preferred >> for your vaapi driver, it would be better to query the capability from the >> driver, like as what commit 9f02e033875185409c861846f209b04a3be339d2 did. > > It's not about an encoder, but rather about decoder. Some decoders > (namely the Snapdragon HW decoder) > will buffer frames when pic_order_cnt_type == 0 (in case the frames > will be reordered?) which results > in undesired increased latency. Setting pic_order_cnt_type to 2 will > fix this problem, and it is also what > libx264 does [0]. Has that decoder bug been reported to the vendor so that they can fix it? The decoder should be reading the stream buffering from max_num_reorder_frames in the VUI parameters, which is set at as expected <http://git.videolan.org/?p=ffmpeg.git;a=blob;f=libavcodec/vaapi_encode_h264.c;h=dd17be2190ab07331ed69cf830b8cea2584ad353;hb=HEAD#l478>. The change to using POC type 2 is not unreasonable to save a few bits, but to do it you will also need to fix all of the POC values to actually match the type 2 behaviour (the current type 0 setup steps by 1 on frames because interlacing is not supported, but type 2 always steps by 2 - see §8.2.1.3). - Mark
On Mon, Jan 9, 2023 at 10:11 PM Mark Thompson <sw@jkqxz.net> wrote: > > On 09/01/2023 07:37, David Rosca wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 9, 2023 at 3:22 AM Xiang, Haihao <haihao.xiang@intel.com> wrote: > >> > >> On Do, 2022-12-29 at 22:20 +0100, David Rosca wrote: > >>> --- > >>> libavcodec/vaapi_encode_h264.c | 2 +- > >>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > >>> > >>> diff --git a/libavcodec/vaapi_encode_h264.c b/libavcodec/vaapi_encode_h264.c > >>> index dd17be2..d6926c4 100644 > >>> --- a/libavcodec/vaapi_encode_h264.c > >>> +++ b/libavcodec/vaapi_encode_h264.c > >>> @@ -350,7 +350,7 @@ static int > >>> vaapi_encode_h264_init_sequence_params(AVCodecContext *avctx) > >>> sps->chroma_format_idc = 1; > >>> > >>> sps->log2_max_frame_num_minus4 = 4; > >>> - sps->pic_order_cnt_type = 0; > >>> + sps->pic_order_cnt_type = ctx->max_b_depth ? 0 : 2; > >> > >> > >> pic_order_cnt_type (0) should work for ctx->max_b_depth == 0. If 2 is preferred > >> for your vaapi driver, it would be better to query the capability from the > >> driver, like as what commit 9f02e033875185409c861846f209b04a3be339d2 did. > > > > It's not about an encoder, but rather about decoder. Some decoders > > (namely the Snapdragon HW decoder) > > will buffer frames when pic_order_cnt_type == 0 (in case the frames > > will be reordered?) which results > > in undesired increased latency. Setting pic_order_cnt_type to 2 will > > fix this problem, and it is also what > > libx264 does [0]. > > Has that decoder bug been reported to the vendor so that they can fix it? I haven't and I'm not sure where I would check if it was already reported by someone else. I wasn't even sure it's a bug since all encoders I have tried so far (x264, nvenc, amf) will output pic_order_cnt_type=2 when configured for low latency encoding. > > The decoder should be reading the stream buffering from max_num_reorder_frames in the VUI parameters, which is set at as expected <http://git.videolan.org/?p=ffmpeg.git;a=blob;f=libavcodec/vaapi_encode_h264.c;h=dd17be2190ab07331ed69cf830b8cea2584ad353;hb=HEAD#l478>. > > The change to using POC type 2 is not unreasonable to save a few bits, but to do it you will also need to fix all of the POC values to actually match the type 2 behaviour (the current type 0 setup steps by 1 on frames because interlacing is not supported, but type 2 always steps by 2 - see §8.2.1.3). > > - Mark > _______________________________________________ > ffmpeg-devel mailing list > ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org > https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel > > To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email > ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
diff --git a/libavcodec/vaapi_encode_h264.c b/libavcodec/vaapi_encode_h264.c index dd17be2..d6926c4 100644 --- a/libavcodec/vaapi_encode_h264.c +++ b/libavcodec/vaapi_encode_h264.c @@ -350,7 +350,7 @@ static int vaapi_encode_h264_init_sequence_params(AVCodecContext *avctx) sps->chroma_format_idc = 1; sps->log2_max_frame_num_minus4 = 4; - sps->pic_order_cnt_type = 0; + sps->pic_order_cnt_type = ctx->max_b_depth ? 0 : 2; sps->log2_max_pic_order_cnt_lsb_minus4 = 4; sps->max_num_ref_frames = priv->dpb_frames;