Message ID | 20240128030136.5585-3-cus@passwd.hu |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Series | [FFmpeg-devel,1/3] avutil/rational: increase av_d2q precision | expand |
Context | Check | Description |
---|---|---|
yinshiyou/make_loongarch64 | success | Make finished |
yinshiyou/make_fate_loongarch64 | success | Make fate finished |
andriy/make_x86 | success | Make finished |
andriy/make_fate_x86 | success | Make fate finished |
On Sun, Jan 28, 2024 at 04:01:36AM +0100, Marton Balint wrote: > Yadif filter assumed that the output timebase is always half of the input > timebase. This is not true if halving the input time base is not representable > as an AVRational causing the output timestamps to be invalidly scaled in such a > case. > > So let's use av_reduce instead of av_mul_q when calculating the output time > base and if the conversion is inexact then let's fall back to the original > timebase which probably makes more parctical sense than using x/INT_MAX. > > Fixes invalidly scaled pts_time values in this command line: > ffmpeg -f lavfi -i testsrc -vf settb=tb=1/2000000000,yadif,showinfo -f null none > > Signed-off-by: Marton Balint <cus@passwd.hu> > --- > libavfilter/yadif.h | 2 ++ > libavfilter/yadif_common.c | 20 ++++++++++++++------ > 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/libavfilter/yadif.h b/libavfilter/yadif.h > index 2c4fed62d2..c144568242 100644 > --- a/libavfilter/yadif.h > +++ b/libavfilter/yadif.h > @@ -86,6 +86,8 @@ typedef struct YADIFContext { > * the first field. > */ > int current_field; ///< YADIFCurrentField > + > + int pts_divisor; > } YADIFContext; > > void ff_yadif_init_x86(YADIFContext *yadif); > diff --git a/libavfilter/yadif_common.c b/libavfilter/yadif_common.c > index 933372529e..90a5cffc2d 100644 > --- a/libavfilter/yadif_common.c > +++ b/libavfilter/yadif_common.c > @@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ FF_ENABLE_DEPRECATION_WARNINGS > int64_t next_pts = yadif->next->pts; > > if (next_pts != AV_NOPTS_VALUE && cur_pts != AV_NOPTS_VALUE) { > - yadif->out->pts = cur_pts + next_pts; > + yadif->out->pts = (cur_pts + next_pts) / yadif->pts_divisor; > } else { > yadif->out->pts = AV_NOPTS_VALUE; > } > @@ -150,8 +150,8 @@ int ff_yadif_filter_frame(AVFilterLink *link, AVFrame *frame) > ff_ccfifo_inject(&yadif->cc_fifo, yadif->out); > av_frame_free(&yadif->prev); > if (yadif->out->pts != AV_NOPTS_VALUE) > - yadif->out->pts *= 2; > - yadif->out->duration *= 2; > + yadif->out->pts *= 2 / yadif->pts_divisor; > + yadif->out->duration *= 2 / yadif->pts_divisor; > return ff_filter_frame(ctx->outputs[0], yadif->out); > } > > @@ -168,9 +168,9 @@ FF_ENABLE_DEPRECATION_WARNINGS > yadif->out->flags &= ~AV_FRAME_FLAG_INTERLACED; > > if (yadif->out->pts != AV_NOPTS_VALUE) > - yadif->out->pts *= 2; > + yadif->out->pts *= 2 / yadif->pts_divisor; > if (!(yadif->mode & 1)) > - yadif->out->duration *= 2; > + yadif->out->duration *= 2 / yadif->pts_divisor; you can use >> instead of division for all above otherwise should be ok thx [...]
On Wed, 31 Jan 2024, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > On Sun, Jan 28, 2024 at 04:01:36AM +0100, Marton Balint wrote: >> Yadif filter assumed that the output timebase is always half of the input >> timebase. This is not true if halving the input time base is not representable >> as an AVRational causing the output timestamps to be invalidly scaled in such a >> case. >> >> So let's use av_reduce instead of av_mul_q when calculating the output time >> base and if the conversion is inexact then let's fall back to the original >> timebase which probably makes more parctical sense than using x/INT_MAX. >> >> Fixes invalidly scaled pts_time values in this command line: >> ffmpeg -f lavfi -i testsrc -vf settb=tb=1/2000000000,yadif,showinfo -f null none >> >> Signed-off-by: Marton Balint <cus@passwd.hu> >> --- >> libavfilter/yadif.h | 2 ++ >> libavfilter/yadif_common.c | 20 ++++++++++++++------ >> 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/libavfilter/yadif.h b/libavfilter/yadif.h >> index 2c4fed62d2..c144568242 100644 >> --- a/libavfilter/yadif.h >> +++ b/libavfilter/yadif.h >> @@ -86,6 +86,8 @@ typedef struct YADIFContext { >> * the first field. >> */ >> int current_field; ///< YADIFCurrentField >> + >> + int pts_divisor; >> } YADIFContext; >> >> void ff_yadif_init_x86(YADIFContext *yadif); >> diff --git a/libavfilter/yadif_common.c b/libavfilter/yadif_common.c >> index 933372529e..90a5cffc2d 100644 >> --- a/libavfilter/yadif_common.c >> +++ b/libavfilter/yadif_common.c >> @@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ FF_ENABLE_DEPRECATION_WARNINGS >> int64_t next_pts = yadif->next->pts; >> >> if (next_pts != AV_NOPTS_VALUE && cur_pts != AV_NOPTS_VALUE) { >> - yadif->out->pts = cur_pts + next_pts; >> + yadif->out->pts = (cur_pts + next_pts) / yadif->pts_divisor; >> } else { >> yadif->out->pts = AV_NOPTS_VALUE; >> } >> @@ -150,8 +150,8 @@ int ff_yadif_filter_frame(AVFilterLink *link, AVFrame *frame) >> ff_ccfifo_inject(&yadif->cc_fifo, yadif->out); >> av_frame_free(&yadif->prev); >> if (yadif->out->pts != AV_NOPTS_VALUE) >> - yadif->out->pts *= 2; >> - yadif->out->duration *= 2; >> + yadif->out->pts *= 2 / yadif->pts_divisor; >> + yadif->out->duration *= 2 / yadif->pts_divisor; >> return ff_filter_frame(ctx->outputs[0], yadif->out); >> } >> >> @@ -168,9 +168,9 @@ FF_ENABLE_DEPRECATION_WARNINGS >> yadif->out->flags &= ~AV_FRAME_FLAG_INTERLACED; >> >> if (yadif->out->pts != AV_NOPTS_VALUE) >> - yadif->out->pts *= 2; >> + yadif->out->pts *= 2 / yadif->pts_divisor; >> if (!(yadif->mode & 1)) >> - yadif->out->duration *= 2; >> + yadif->out->duration *= 2 / yadif->pts_divisor; > > you can use >> instead of division for all above Even for the first case? Because the right shift would be implementation defined for negative timestamps. Thanks, Marton
On Wed, Jan 31, 2024 at 03:42:46AM +0100, Marton Balint wrote: > > > On Wed, 31 Jan 2024, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > > > On Sun, Jan 28, 2024 at 04:01:36AM +0100, Marton Balint wrote: > > > Yadif filter assumed that the output timebase is always half of the input > > > timebase. This is not true if halving the input time base is not representable > > > as an AVRational causing the output timestamps to be invalidly scaled in such a > > > case. > > > > > > So let's use av_reduce instead of av_mul_q when calculating the output time > > > base and if the conversion is inexact then let's fall back to the original > > > timebase which probably makes more parctical sense than using x/INT_MAX. > > > > > > Fixes invalidly scaled pts_time values in this command line: > > > ffmpeg -f lavfi -i testsrc -vf settb=tb=1/2000000000,yadif,showinfo -f null none > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Marton Balint <cus@passwd.hu> > > > --- > > > libavfilter/yadif.h | 2 ++ > > > libavfilter/yadif_common.c | 20 ++++++++++++++------ > > > 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/libavfilter/yadif.h b/libavfilter/yadif.h > > > index 2c4fed62d2..c144568242 100644 > > > --- a/libavfilter/yadif.h > > > +++ b/libavfilter/yadif.h > > > @@ -86,6 +86,8 @@ typedef struct YADIFContext { > > > * the first field. > > > */ > > > int current_field; ///< YADIFCurrentField > > > + > > > + int pts_divisor; > > > } YADIFContext; > > > > > > void ff_yadif_init_x86(YADIFContext *yadif); > > > diff --git a/libavfilter/yadif_common.c b/libavfilter/yadif_common.c > > > index 933372529e..90a5cffc2d 100644 > > > --- a/libavfilter/yadif_common.c > > > +++ b/libavfilter/yadif_common.c > > > @@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ FF_ENABLE_DEPRECATION_WARNINGS > > > int64_t next_pts = yadif->next->pts; > > > > > > if (next_pts != AV_NOPTS_VALUE && cur_pts != AV_NOPTS_VALUE) { > > > - yadif->out->pts = cur_pts + next_pts; > > > + yadif->out->pts = (cur_pts + next_pts) / yadif->pts_divisor; > > > } else { > > > yadif->out->pts = AV_NOPTS_VALUE; > > > } > > > @@ -150,8 +150,8 @@ int ff_yadif_filter_frame(AVFilterLink *link, AVFrame *frame) > > > ff_ccfifo_inject(&yadif->cc_fifo, yadif->out); > > > av_frame_free(&yadif->prev); > > > if (yadif->out->pts != AV_NOPTS_VALUE) > > > - yadif->out->pts *= 2; > > > - yadif->out->duration *= 2; > > > + yadif->out->pts *= 2 / yadif->pts_divisor; > > > + yadif->out->duration *= 2 / yadif->pts_divisor; > > > return ff_filter_frame(ctx->outputs[0], yadif->out); > > > } > > > > > > @@ -168,9 +168,9 @@ FF_ENABLE_DEPRECATION_WARNINGS > > > yadif->out->flags &= ~AV_FRAME_FLAG_INTERLACED; > > > > > > if (yadif->out->pts != AV_NOPTS_VALUE) > > > - yadif->out->pts *= 2; > > > + yadif->out->pts *= 2 / yadif->pts_divisor; > > > if (!(yadif->mode & 1)) > > > - yadif->out->duration *= 2; > > > + yadif->out->duration *= 2 / yadif->pts_divisor; > > > > you can use >> instead of division for all above > > Even for the first case? Because the right shift would be implementation > defined for negative timestamps. we are only supporting twos-complement systems i thought that was somewhete in teh docs thx [...]
On Thu, 1 Feb 2024, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > On Wed, Jan 31, 2024 at 03:42:46AM +0100, Marton Balint wrote: >> >> >> On Wed, 31 Jan 2024, Michael Niedermayer wrote: >> >>> On Sun, Jan 28, 2024 at 04:01:36AM +0100, Marton Balint wrote: >>>> Yadif filter assumed that the output timebase is always half of the input >>>> timebase. This is not true if halving the input time base is not representable >>>> as an AVRational causing the output timestamps to be invalidly scaled in such a >>>> case. >>>> >>>> So let's use av_reduce instead of av_mul_q when calculating the output time >>>> base and if the conversion is inexact then let's fall back to the original >>>> timebase which probably makes more parctical sense than using x/INT_MAX. >>>> >>>> Fixes invalidly scaled pts_time values in this command line: >>>> ffmpeg -f lavfi -i testsrc -vf settb=tb=1/2000000000,yadif,showinfo -f null none >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Marton Balint <cus@passwd.hu> >>>> --- >>>> libavfilter/yadif.h | 2 ++ >>>> libavfilter/yadif_common.c | 20 ++++++++++++++------ >>>> 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) >>>> >>>> diff --git a/libavfilter/yadif.h b/libavfilter/yadif.h >>>> index 2c4fed62d2..c144568242 100644 >>>> --- a/libavfilter/yadif.h >>>> +++ b/libavfilter/yadif.h >>>> @@ -86,6 +86,8 @@ typedef struct YADIFContext { >>>> * the first field. >>>> */ >>>> int current_field; ///< YADIFCurrentField >>>> + >>>> + int pts_divisor; >>>> } YADIFContext; >>>> >>>> void ff_yadif_init_x86(YADIFContext *yadif); >>>> diff --git a/libavfilter/yadif_common.c b/libavfilter/yadif_common.c >>>> index 933372529e..90a5cffc2d 100644 >>>> --- a/libavfilter/yadif_common.c >>>> +++ b/libavfilter/yadif_common.c >>>> @@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ FF_ENABLE_DEPRECATION_WARNINGS >>>> int64_t next_pts = yadif->next->pts; >>>> >>>> if (next_pts != AV_NOPTS_VALUE && cur_pts != AV_NOPTS_VALUE) { >>>> - yadif->out->pts = cur_pts + next_pts; >>>> + yadif->out->pts = (cur_pts + next_pts) / yadif->pts_divisor; >>>> } else { >>>> yadif->out->pts = AV_NOPTS_VALUE; >>>> } >>>> @@ -150,8 +150,8 @@ int ff_yadif_filter_frame(AVFilterLink *link, AVFrame *frame) >>>> ff_ccfifo_inject(&yadif->cc_fifo, yadif->out); >>>> av_frame_free(&yadif->prev); >>>> if (yadif->out->pts != AV_NOPTS_VALUE) >>>> - yadif->out->pts *= 2; >>>> - yadif->out->duration *= 2; >>>> + yadif->out->pts *= 2 / yadif->pts_divisor; >>>> + yadif->out->duration *= 2 / yadif->pts_divisor; >>>> return ff_filter_frame(ctx->outputs[0], yadif->out); >>>> } >>>> >>>> @@ -168,9 +168,9 @@ FF_ENABLE_DEPRECATION_WARNINGS >>>> yadif->out->flags &= ~AV_FRAME_FLAG_INTERLACED; >>>> >>>> if (yadif->out->pts != AV_NOPTS_VALUE) >>>> - yadif->out->pts *= 2; >>>> + yadif->out->pts *= 2 / yadif->pts_divisor; >>>> if (!(yadif->mode & 1)) >>>> - yadif->out->duration *= 2; >>>> + yadif->out->duration *= 2 / yadif->pts_divisor; >>> >>> you can use >> instead of division for all above >> >> Even for the first case? Because the right shift would be implementation >> defined for negative timestamps. > > we are only supporting twos-complement systems > i thought that was somewhete in teh docs Ok, I will change the /= 2 divisions to >>= 1 shifts in v2 patch then. Thanks, Marton
On Thu, 1 Feb 2024, Marton Balint wrote: > > On Thu, 1 Feb 2024, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > >> On Wed, Jan 31, 2024 at 03:42:46AM +0100, Marton Balint wrote: >>> >>> >>> On Wed, 31 Jan 2024, Michael Niedermayer wrote: >>> >>>> On Sun, Jan 28, 2024 at 04:01:36AM +0100, Marton Balint wrote: >>>>> Yadif filter assumed that the output timebase is always half of the >>>>> input >>>>> timebase. This is not true if halving the input time base is not >>>>> representable >>>>> as an AVRational causing the output timestamps to be invalidly scaled >>>>> in such a >>>>> case. >>>>> >>>>> So let's use av_reduce instead of av_mul_q when calculating the output >>>>> time >>>>> base and if the conversion is inexact then let's fall back to the >>>>> original >>>>> timebase which probably makes more parctical sense than using >>>>> x/INT_MAX. >>>>> >>>>> Fixes invalidly scaled pts_time values in this command line: >>>>> ffmpeg -f lavfi -i testsrc -vf settb=tb=1/2000000000,yadif,showinfo -f >>>>> null none >>>>> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Marton Balint <cus@passwd.hu> >>>>> --- >>>>> libavfilter/yadif.h | 2 ++ >>>>> libavfilter/yadif_common.c | 20 ++++++++++++++------ >>>>> 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) >>>>> >>>>> diff --git a/libavfilter/yadif.h b/libavfilter/yadif.h >>>>> index 2c4fed62d2..c144568242 100644 >>>>> --- a/libavfilter/yadif.h >>>>> +++ b/libavfilter/yadif.h >>>>> @@ -86,6 +86,8 @@ typedef struct YADIFContext { >>>>> * the first field. >>>>> */ >>>>> int current_field; ///< YADIFCurrentField >>>>> + >>>>> + int pts_divisor; >>>>> } YADIFContext; >>>>> >>>>> void ff_yadif_init_x86(YADIFContext *yadif); >>>>> diff --git a/libavfilter/yadif_common.c b/libavfilter/yadif_common.c >>>>> index 933372529e..90a5cffc2d 100644 >>>>> --- a/libavfilter/yadif_common.c >>>>> +++ b/libavfilter/yadif_common.c >>>>> @@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ FF_ENABLE_DEPRECATION_WARNINGS >>>>> int64_t next_pts = yadif->next->pts; >>>>> >>>>> if (next_pts != AV_NOPTS_VALUE && cur_pts != AV_NOPTS_VALUE) { >>>>> - yadif->out->pts = cur_pts + next_pts; >>>>> + yadif->out->pts = (cur_pts + next_pts) / >>>>> yadif->pts_divisor; >>>>> } else { >>>>> yadif->out->pts = AV_NOPTS_VALUE; >>>>> } >>>>> @@ -150,8 +150,8 @@ int ff_yadif_filter_frame(AVFilterLink *link, >>>>> AVFrame *frame) >>>>> ff_ccfifo_inject(&yadif->cc_fifo, yadif->out); >>>>> av_frame_free(&yadif->prev); >>>>> if (yadif->out->pts != AV_NOPTS_VALUE) >>>>> - yadif->out->pts *= 2; >>>>> - yadif->out->duration *= 2; >>>>> + yadif->out->pts *= 2 / yadif->pts_divisor; >>>>> + yadif->out->duration *= 2 / yadif->pts_divisor; >>>>> return ff_filter_frame(ctx->outputs[0], yadif->out); >>>>> } >>>>> >>>>> @@ -168,9 +168,9 @@ FF_ENABLE_DEPRECATION_WARNINGS >>>>> yadif->out->flags &= ~AV_FRAME_FLAG_INTERLACED; >>>>> >>>>> if (yadif->out->pts != AV_NOPTS_VALUE) >>>>> - yadif->out->pts *= 2; >>>>> + yadif->out->pts *= 2 / yadif->pts_divisor; >>>>> if (!(yadif->mode & 1)) >>>>> - yadif->out->duration *= 2; >>>>> + yadif->out->duration *= 2 / yadif->pts_divisor; >>>> >>>> you can use >> instead of division for all above >>> >>> Even for the first case? Because the right shift would be implementation >>> defined for negative timestamps. >> >> we are only supporting twos-complement systems >> i thought that was somewhete in teh docs > > Ok, I will change the /= 2 divisions to >>= 1 shifts in v2 patch then. Will apply the series. Regards, Marton
diff --git a/libavfilter/yadif.h b/libavfilter/yadif.h index 2c4fed62d2..c144568242 100644 --- a/libavfilter/yadif.h +++ b/libavfilter/yadif.h @@ -86,6 +86,8 @@ typedef struct YADIFContext { * the first field. */ int current_field; ///< YADIFCurrentField + + int pts_divisor; } YADIFContext; void ff_yadif_init_x86(YADIFContext *yadif); diff --git a/libavfilter/yadif_common.c b/libavfilter/yadif_common.c index 933372529e..90a5cffc2d 100644 --- a/libavfilter/yadif_common.c +++ b/libavfilter/yadif_common.c @@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ FF_ENABLE_DEPRECATION_WARNINGS int64_t next_pts = yadif->next->pts; if (next_pts != AV_NOPTS_VALUE && cur_pts != AV_NOPTS_VALUE) { - yadif->out->pts = cur_pts + next_pts; + yadif->out->pts = (cur_pts + next_pts) / yadif->pts_divisor; } else { yadif->out->pts = AV_NOPTS_VALUE; } @@ -150,8 +150,8 @@ int ff_yadif_filter_frame(AVFilterLink *link, AVFrame *frame) ff_ccfifo_inject(&yadif->cc_fifo, yadif->out); av_frame_free(&yadif->prev); if (yadif->out->pts != AV_NOPTS_VALUE) - yadif->out->pts *= 2; - yadif->out->duration *= 2; + yadif->out->pts *= 2 / yadif->pts_divisor; + yadif->out->duration *= 2 / yadif->pts_divisor; return ff_filter_frame(ctx->outputs[0], yadif->out); } @@ -168,9 +168,9 @@ FF_ENABLE_DEPRECATION_WARNINGS yadif->out->flags &= ~AV_FRAME_FLAG_INTERLACED; if (yadif->out->pts != AV_NOPTS_VALUE) - yadif->out->pts *= 2; + yadif->out->pts *= 2 / yadif->pts_divisor; if (!(yadif->mode & 1)) - yadif->out->duration *= 2; + yadif->out->duration *= 2 / yadif->pts_divisor; return return_frame(ctx, 0); } @@ -213,9 +213,17 @@ int ff_yadif_config_output_common(AVFilterLink *outlink) { AVFilterContext *ctx = outlink->src; YADIFContext *yadif = ctx->priv; + AVRational tb = ctx->inputs[0]->time_base; int ret; - outlink->time_base = av_mul_q(ctx->inputs[0]->time_base, (AVRational){1, 2}); + if (av_reduce(&outlink->time_base.num, &outlink->time_base.den, tb.num, tb.den * 2LL, INT_MAX)) { + yadif->pts_divisor = 1; + } else { + av_log(ctx, AV_LOG_WARNING, "Cannot use exact output timebase\n"); + outlink->time_base = tb; + yadif->pts_divisor = 2; + } + outlink->w = ctx->inputs[0]->w; outlink->h = ctx->inputs[0]->h;
Yadif filter assumed that the output timebase is always half of the input timebase. This is not true if halving the input time base is not representable as an AVRational causing the output timestamps to be invalidly scaled in such a case. So let's use av_reduce instead of av_mul_q when calculating the output time base and if the conversion is inexact then let's fall back to the original timebase which probably makes more parctical sense than using x/INT_MAX. Fixes invalidly scaled pts_time values in this command line: ffmpeg -f lavfi -i testsrc -vf settb=tb=1/2000000000,yadif,showinfo -f null none Signed-off-by: Marton Balint <cus@passwd.hu> --- libavfilter/yadif.h | 2 ++ libavfilter/yadif_common.c | 20 ++++++++++++++------ 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)