Message ID | GV1P250MB0737CBAF57E68F4DD8CE0F9F8F33A@GV1P250MB0737.EURP250.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM |
---|---|
State | Accepted |
Headers | show |
Series | [FFmpeg-devel] avcodec/decode: Return EAGAIN instead of overwriting unused packet | expand |
Context | Check | Description |
---|---|---|
yinshiyou/make_loongarch64 | success | Make finished |
yinshiyou/make_fate_loongarch64 | success | Make fate finished |
andriy/make_x86 | success | Make finished |
andriy/make_fate_x86 | success | Make fate finished |
Quoting Andreas Rheinhardt (2023-07-10 01:36:41) > Should fix #10457, a regression caused by > 69516ab3e917a6e91d26e38d04183c60fd71cbab. > > Signed-off-by: Andreas Rheinhardt <andreas.rheinhardt@outlook.com> > --- > I am not sure about this one. The problem is that avcodec_send_packet() > and avcodec_receive_frame() must not return EAGAIN at the same time. > If buffer_frame contains a frame when entering avcodec_send_packet(), > the next call to avcodec_receive_frame() will not return EAGAIN. > But is this actually guaranteed if buffer_pkt is not empty? It's not guaranteed, but I believe the correct interpretation of the "must not return EAGAIN at the same time" line is that send->receive->send must make progress and not be 3x EAGAIN. > > libavcodec/decode.c | 3 +++ > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/libavcodec/decode.c b/libavcodec/decode.c > index 269633ce10..6595c3ca34 100644 > --- a/libavcodec/decode.c > +++ b/libavcodec/decode.c > @@ -666,6 +666,9 @@ int attribute_align_arg avcodec_send_packet(AVCodecContext *avctx, const AVPacke > if (avpkt && !avpkt->size && avpkt->data) > return AVERROR(EINVAL); > > + if (!AVPACKET_IS_EMPTY(avci->buffer_pkt)) > + return AVERROR(EAGAIN); > + > av_packet_unref(avci->buffer_pkt); This unref here becomes redundant. Otherwise looks good, thanks.
Anton Khirnov: > Quoting Andreas Rheinhardt (2023-07-10 01:36:41) >> Should fix #10457, a regression caused by >> 69516ab3e917a6e91d26e38d04183c60fd71cbab. >> >> Signed-off-by: Andreas Rheinhardt <andreas.rheinhardt@outlook.com> >> --- >> I am not sure about this one. The problem is that avcodec_send_packet() >> and avcodec_receive_frame() must not return EAGAIN at the same time. >> If buffer_frame contains a frame when entering avcodec_send_packet(), >> the next call to avcodec_receive_frame() will not return EAGAIN. >> But is this actually guaranteed if buffer_pkt is not empty? > > It's not guaranteed, but I believe the correct interpretation of the > "must not return EAGAIN at the same time" line is that > send->receive->send must make progress and not be 3x EAGAIN. > > >> >> libavcodec/decode.c | 3 +++ >> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/libavcodec/decode.c b/libavcodec/decode.c >> index 269633ce10..6595c3ca34 100644 >> --- a/libavcodec/decode.c >> +++ b/libavcodec/decode.c >> @@ -666,6 +666,9 @@ int attribute_align_arg avcodec_send_packet(AVCodecContext *avctx, const AVPacke >> if (avpkt && !avpkt->size && avpkt->data) >> return AVERROR(EINVAL); >> >> + if (!AVPACKET_IS_EMPTY(avci->buffer_pkt)) >> + return AVERROR(EAGAIN); >> + >> av_packet_unref(avci->buffer_pkt); > > This unref here becomes redundant. > > Otherwise looks good, thanks. > Will apply with the unref removed. - Andreas
On Mon, 10 Jul 2023, Anton Khirnov wrote: > Quoting Andreas Rheinhardt (2023-07-10 01:36:41) >> Should fix #10457, a regression caused by >> 69516ab3e917a6e91d26e38d04183c60fd71cbab. >> >> Signed-off-by: Andreas Rheinhardt <andreas.rheinhardt@outlook.com> >> --- >> I am not sure about this one. The problem is that avcodec_send_packet() >> and avcodec_receive_frame() must not return EAGAIN at the same time. >> If buffer_frame contains a frame when entering avcodec_send_packet(), >> the next call to avcodec_receive_frame() will not return EAGAIN. >> But is this actually guaranteed if buffer_pkt is not empty? > > It's not guaranteed, but I believe the correct interpretation of the > "must not return EAGAIN at the same time" line is that > send->receive->send must make progress and not be 3x EAGAIN. I don't think that 2x EAGAIN is allowed, the docs says: ... the only guarantee is that an AVERROR(EAGAIN) return value on a send/receive call on one end implies that a receive/send call on the other end will succeed, or at least will not fail with AVERROR(EAGAIN). In general, no codec will permit unlimited buffering of input or output. Regards, Marton > > >> >> libavcodec/decode.c | 3 +++ >> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/libavcodec/decode.c b/libavcodec/decode.c >> index 269633ce10..6595c3ca34 100644 >> --- a/libavcodec/decode.c >> +++ b/libavcodec/decode.c >> @@ -666,6 +666,9 @@ int attribute_align_arg avcodec_send_packet(AVCodecContext *avctx, const AVPacke >> if (avpkt && !avpkt->size && avpkt->data) >> return AVERROR(EINVAL); >> >> + if (!AVPACKET_IS_EMPTY(avci->buffer_pkt)) >> + return AVERROR(EAGAIN); >> + >> av_packet_unref(avci->buffer_pkt); > > This unref here becomes redundant. > > Otherwise looks good, thanks. > > -- > Anton Khirnov > _______________________________________________ > ffmpeg-devel mailing list > ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org > https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel > > To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email > ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe". >
diff --git a/libavcodec/decode.c b/libavcodec/decode.c index 269633ce10..6595c3ca34 100644 --- a/libavcodec/decode.c +++ b/libavcodec/decode.c @@ -666,6 +666,9 @@ int attribute_align_arg avcodec_send_packet(AVCodecContext *avctx, const AVPacke if (avpkt && !avpkt->size && avpkt->data) return AVERROR(EINVAL); + if (!AVPACKET_IS_EMPTY(avci->buffer_pkt)) + return AVERROR(EAGAIN); + av_packet_unref(avci->buffer_pkt); if (avpkt && (avpkt->data || avpkt->side_data_elems)) { ret = av_packet_ref(avci->buffer_pkt, avpkt);
Should fix #10457, a regression caused by 69516ab3e917a6e91d26e38d04183c60fd71cbab. Signed-off-by: Andreas Rheinhardt <andreas.rheinhardt@outlook.com> --- I am not sure about this one. The problem is that avcodec_send_packet() and avcodec_receive_frame() must not return EAGAIN at the same time. If buffer_frame contains a frame when entering avcodec_send_packet(), the next call to avcodec_receive_frame() will not return EAGAIN. But is this actually guaranteed if buffer_pkt is not empty? libavcodec/decode.c | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)